Book review: The Poems of Robert Frost

Book review: The Poems of Robert Frost

no need for a treasure map…

 

 

Book review:

The Poems of Robert Frost

With an Introductory Essay “The Constant Symbol”

 

by Robert Lee Frost (1874-1963)

New York: The Modern Library/Random House, Inc., 1946

 

In his opening essay, Frost says “…poetry…is metaphor, saying one thing and meaning another, saying one thing in terms of another, the pleasure of ulteriority. Poetry is simply made of metaphor.”

My copy of The Poems of Robert Frost is a treasure ship with two old stained green covers. I’ve been reading it for about 60 years. It’s a bit beat up, but when I open it, it shines.

I’m not reckless enough to name “my favorite” poem—I keep changing my mind as I read through them again. Frost is a teacher. He has found so many of the right words, and he has put so many of them in the right order.

I always enjoy “The Last Word of a Bluebird (as told to a child).” The Crow carries the little Bluebird’s final message to Lesley. In his low voice he brings word about the north wind and the impending winter cold that drives the Bluebird away. The compassionate bird urges Lesley to be good, and promises that “…perhaps in the spring/He would come back and sing.”

I’m waiting for the spring time, and I have a good book to help me pass the time.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2019 All rights reserved.

As with another eye: Poems of exactitude with 55 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review: The Comanche Empire

Book review: The Comanche Empire

“…conquerors who saw themselves

        more as guardians…”

 

 

Book review:

The Comanche Empire

 

by Pekka Hämäläinen

New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.

 

This book will change your mind about how the West was won.

Hint: The Comanches got there first.

The Comanches arrived obscurely in the American Southwest in 1706. The Comanche Empire provocatively makes the case that the Comanches created an imposing Southwestern American empire that spanned 150 years. They blunted the 18th century colonial ambitions of the Spanish in Mexico and the French in Louisiana, and stalled the westward thrust of Americans and the U.S. government until the middle of the 19th century. A broad coalition of Comanche rancheria chiefs throughout the territory of Comancheria first dominated the Apaches, eventually turned against their Ute allies, and commercially or militarily subjugated numerous lesser tribes.

Comanches managed a succession of peace treaties and conflicts with the Spaniards and completely blocked their repeated efforts to extend colonial settlements northward from Mexico. The political, commercial and military supremacy of the Comanches was based principally on their success in adopting and adapting Spanish horses for efficient transportation, military power, and a thriving and lucrative trade in horses throughout the Southwest.

Hämäläinen‘s central argument invites—indeed it obviously provokes—a reasonable dispute about the credibility of his claim for a Comanche empire. Clearly, in classical political or geopolitical usage, the claim is untenable, at least in part; the Comanche empire had neither fixed borders, nor a single self-sustaining centralized supreme authority, nor a durable bureaucracy, nor a definitive political structure.

Comanche girls wikimedia Comanche_girlsNevertheless, the Comanches had a respected, recurring broadly representative council of chiefs that planned and organized extensive raids, trading and other commerce, and military operations. Their hunting, pasturing, and trading territories had indistinct geographic borders that were never surveyed or adjudicated; Comanches never sought to occupy and permanently control any specifically delineated territory. In The Comanche Empire, Hämäläinen says they were “conquerors who saw themselves more as guardians than governors of the land and its bounties.” Nonetheless, the geographical extent of the their domains was well known, respected and enforced by the Comanches.

Each Comanche rancheria had its own geographic territory, rigorous socio-military culture and hierarchical organization. The situational circumstances of Comanche military superiority, their control of trade  and their ability through the decades to repeatedly impose and maintain obviously favorable terms in their treaty and trade agreements are undeniable evidence of the Comanches’ extended dominance of terrain, physical resources, culture and commerce, and, not least in importance, the Spanish and French colonial enterprises that sought to compete with them.

For decades the Comanches set the terms of their success; no competing power could defeat them, and no Indians or Europeans could evade the Comanches’ dominance in their domain.

It becomes obvious: the Comanches created a de facto empire.

Ultimately, they were marginalized by a combination of drought that constrained their bison hunting and weakened their pastoral horse culture, disruption of trade that limited their access to essential carbohydrate foodstuffs, epidemic disease that repeatedly thinned the Comanche populations, predatory bison hunting by the Americans in the early 1870s that wiped out the Indians’ essential food resource, and, finally, by the irresistible tide of U.S. government-sponsored westward migration that pushed American citizens into Comanche territory.

Too bad the Comanches left no accounts of their own. It would be fascinating to hear this story in their own words.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2019 All rights reserved.

 

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review: The Cradle Place by Thomas Lux

Book review: The Cradle Place by Thomas Lux

clunky is the word…

 

 

Book review:

The Cradle Place

 

by Thomas Lux (1946-2017)

New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004

61 pages

 

Some folks think Thomas Lux deserves to be a prize winner.

Not likely. He offers joyfully erratic, uncivil, and unimaginable poems.

Lux inclines to clunky excess in his descriptions. No spirits are born in The Cradle Place.

Although the jacket notes refer to “refreshing iconoclasms,” I couldn’t find any.

Mary Oliver doesn’t have to move over…

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2018 All rights reserved.

 

Thieves in the Night

A story of Israel…(book review)

by Arthur Koestler

click here

Seeing far: Selected poems with 47 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review: Moral Tribes by Joshua Greene

Book review: Moral Tribes by Joshua Greene

a miss on tactics,

   a miss on strategy…

 

 

 

Book review:

   Moral Tribes:

   Emotion, Reason,

   and the Gap

      Between Us and Them

 

by Joshua Greene

New York, Penguin Press, 2013

422 pages

 

 

“This book is an attempt to understand morality from the ground up.” Greene’s sincere aim is a bit too breezy for me.

Reluctantly, I admit I don’t have time to read a book like Moral Tribes right now. I feel like I’m too busy sticking fingers into the terrifying political dike that is threatening to collapse in America, indeed, in the world.

I’m interested in learning more about Greene’s approach in Moral Tribes: “understanding the deep structure of moral problems as well as the differences between the problems that our brains were designed to solve and the distinctively modern problems we face today.”

I don’t have enough time or energy to indulge Greene’s apparently sincere efforts to develop “a practical philosophy that can help us solve our biggest problems.”

America’s problems—Americans’ problems—are all too clear and at least one part of the fix is all too clear: there are lots of folks who can live with and live for the hatred they feel, and they’re voting; there are lots of folks who are afraid of some of the kinds of people who are getting elected and exercising political power to the detriment of most Americans, and too many of these fearful folks aren’t voting.

I think a dominating element of a practical philosophy for America right now is “Get out the vote!”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2018 All rights reserved.

 

A poem about the right thing

…and the lesser incarnation…

“Vanity”

click here

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,

and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)

and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

​*   *   *   *   *   *

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Book review: The Financier

Book review: The Financier

channeling Gordon Gekko…

 

 

Book review:

The Financier

 

by Theodore Dreiser (1871-1945)

First published 1912, Harper and Bros., New York.

 

The Financier was written before its time.

It’s just amazing that Dreiser wrote this gritty novel in 1912, before anyone even thought of derivatives, credit default swaps, sub-prime “liar loan” mortgages, no-fault (for bankers and brokers, that is) national financial meltdowns, and politically-motivated government shutdowns. Frank Cowperwood is the ethically-challenged “financier” whose star and fortunes rise so marvelously and then collapse with equal flare. He seems so absolutely convincingly contemporary that I had recurring transient episodes of reverse déjà vu as I learned about his desperate ambition and burnout.

Frank is a first-rate villain in The Financier. He burns his friends and enemies with equal disdain, he channels Gordon Gekko with suitably theatrical energy, and he is most deliciously unrepentant when his schemes go awry, his loans get called, and then his empire crashes around him.

I guess that I must emphasize “deliciously unrepentant” because, unlike the contemporary villainous free spirits of Wall Street, Frank promptly goes to jail for his crimes.

The Financier so obviously is the kind of novel that might be written by a baroque clone of Michael Lewis. If you’d like to work out a bit of the residual rage you feel about the man-made financial cesspool we wallow in, then try this American classic.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2018 All rights reserved.

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Book review: Lafayette by Harlow Unger

Book review: Lafayette by Harlow Unger

A hero, not a saint

 

 

Book review:

Lafayette

 

by Harlow Giles Unger (b.1931)

Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002

452 pages

 

I acknowledge the obvious: Unger fully entertains in recounting that Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier de la Fayette was a national, military, political and, indeed, a paternal hero to millions in America and France during the American and (several) French revolutions.

There is no doubt that, despite the fact that he was one of the richest French nobles of his time, Lafayette was publicly and privately dedicated to republican government and a social/economic order that was far more egalitarian than the monarchical and aristocratic structures that prevailed.

Was he a great man? Unger, like many of his biographers, says yes. Lafayette was a courageous battlefield leader, he was an enlightened manorial lord who enhanced the lives of his peasants, and he was both outspoken and fearless, repeatedly, in literally dangerous political situations for a couple decades in Revolutionary and Napoleonic France. Unger amply—even poetically—demonstrates these lifelong characteristics of the man Americans called “our Marquis.”

I also feel obliged to call attention to some countervailing factors that Unger fully describes but does not adequately interpret.

Lafayette put his money where his mouth was. He repeatedly used his great personal wealth to pay and outfit the troops he commanded, when government funds and supplies ran low. I suggest a case could be made that the Marquis, uniquely among American commanders, paid for his military success in the Revolutionary War. Throughout the war, the options and operations of colonial commanders were significantly hindered by short funds and short supplies. If Lafayette had not been able to pay, feed, clothe, and arm his troops with his personal resources, could he have been as winning a general as he was? I suspect the answer is “No.”

Some biographers refer to Lafayette as the “victor” at Yorktown in 1781. Unger calls him a “hero” of Yorktown. Lafayette was not the only American general at Yorktown, and he wasn’t the only French general. Lafayette did use his small force to isolate Cornwallis in Yorktown, but he had to wait until Washington, Rochambeau and others arrived with sufficient forces before he participated in the final assaults.

In France he repeatedly declined to step up to the plate and take executive leadership, during the revolutionary and Napoleonic convulsions, when the French people and the contentious military/political factions would have handed the throne or the presidency of France to him on a velvet pillow. The Marquis repeatedly risked his life to defuse explosive situations by his personal, courageous intervention. However, Unger fastidiously details Lafayette’s repeated reluctance to take the final step and take control when, arguably, he could have stabilized dangerous situations, and forestalled or prevented catastrophic consequences. Lafayette wasn’t responsible for the violence, but, time after time, he left a void that unfortunately was filled by lesser men.

Was Lafayette a great man? Yes. A successful general? Yes. Was he a really lucky guy? Yes. Did he and his reputation benefit immensely from great wealth and fortuitous circumstances? Yes. Did he live up to his potential in serving France and the French nation? Maybe not.

There’s just one other thing: Unger profligately demonstrates that Lafayette and Washington had a deeply affectionate man-to-man—explicitly, like father and son—relationship, by using far too many excerpts from their numerous letters. It’s no biggie, but I had to stop reading them about halfway through the book…they bonded, I get it.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2018 All rights reserved.

As with another eye: Poems of exactitude with 55 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Pin It on Pinterest