Book review: Shawshank Redemption

Book review: Shawshank Redemption

Book review:

 

Rita Hayworth

     and the Shawshank Redemption

by Stephen King (b.1947)

 

This irrepressible, inscrutable short story by Stephen King is about bad people who are sort of really good people, and sort of good people who refuse to let really bad things become their way of life.

Red is a murderer, but we get past that in the first pages. Red is the philosopher-king of Shawshank Prison. For my money, Red is the point of the story. He repents his crime, he does the time, he comes to understand Andy Dufresne’s untouchable devotion to regaining his rightful freedom, and Red finally, doggedly, walks the line of rock walls in hayfields in Buxton until he unearths the final proof of a friendship, and hope.

Andy remains a mysterious character, all the way to the end. We know he’s innocent, we know he is cruelly and unjustly entombed and forgotten in hell, we know what he does in Shawshank, we admire his motivation, and yet we know the man only as Red knows him. Red is a passive observer, attentive to be sure, and responsive to Andy’s intellect and his bulldog determination, but Red never penetrates Andy’s mind, never really understands Andy’s private self.

For me, as for Red, the man Dufresne has a full-length poster picture of himself taped to the top of his head, and we never are able to get behind the poster and get in to the real Andy.

 

Enfin, I cheered Andy’s escape, and I was happy that Red finally got on the bus to McNary, Texas, and I think the two will enjoy a decent life in Zihuatanejo…and I think they live in a different world that I do not know, and do not want to know.

 

p.s. the movie is as good as the book.

 

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2017 All rights reserved.

 

Book review: Lord of the Flies

Never more relevant…

by William Golding

click here

 

Poets talk about poetry

…a red hot bucket of love…

click here

Book review: An Empire on the Edge

by Nick Bunker

The British wanted to win

                       the Revolutionary War,

         but they had good reasons

               for not trying too hard…

click here

My first name was rain: A dreamery of poems with 53 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Book review: Forced Founders

Book review: Forced Founders

about the so-called “Founding Fathers”…

 

 

Book review:

Forced Founders:

Indians, Debtors, Slaves

& the Making of the

American Revolution in Virginia

 

by Woody Holton  

Williamsburg, VA: the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1999.

256 pages

 

Holton offers a backstory to the drive by Virginia’s elite political leaders to support the Declaration of Independence and the rebellion against England. He argues that Indians, slaves, merchants and small farmers, each in their own sphere, exerted influence on Washington, Jefferson and other Virginia leaders that helped to motivate their advocacy for independence.

Holton provides rich detail as he explores the obvious and not-so-obvious relationships of these interest groups, and as he describes the not wholly successful effort of the powerful landowners (in many cases, they were also land speculators) to achieve and expand their control of the factors of production: land, capital and labor.

Holton is at his most persuasive when he details circumstances in which the interests of the elites were more or less congruent with the interests of the generally disenfranchised but nevertheless potent subordinate classes who occupied their colonial world.

Forced Founders supports and enlarges our understanding that the so-called “Founding Fathers” were not a monolithic group motivated exclusively by patriotic fervor for independence.

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

 

Book review:

American Scripture:

Making the Declaration of Independence

…basically, it’s trash talk to King George

by Pauline Maier

click here

​-
Above all: Poems of dawn and more with 73 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

 

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Book review: An Empire Divided

Book review: An Empire Divided

it was all about the sugar islands…

 

 

Book review:

An Empire Divided:

The American Revolution

and the British Caribbean

 

by Andrew Jackson O’Shaughnessy

Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000

O’Shaughnessy opens a new chapter in American history for me. One of his central themes is: why didn’t the British West Indies, the “sugar islands,” rebel at the same time as the North American mainland colonies that we know (incompletely) as the 13 original colonies? In fact, why didn’t the fabulously wealthy sugar islands rebel, period?

The West Indies—Barbados, Jamaica, and others in the British Caribbean—were part of the English colonial frontier throughout the period that we customarily regard as colonial American history, but we customarily ignore them. That’s a mistake. The West Indies were strongly integrated with the mainland colonies by trade, but politically they were a breed apart: much more strongly tied to the mother country through their protected status and monopoly exports of sugar products, and therefore much less inclined to rebel and throw away their continuing access to that richly rewarding connection. They needed the English navy to keep predatory French and Spanish forces at bay.

O’Shaughnessy’s prose is engaging, if a bit redundant here and there. He makes it plain that King George and his Privy Council and Parliament consistently dealt with the “big picture” of their Atlantic colonies, and he gives new context to the repeated punitive tax and other policies that helped to precipitate the Revolution.

An interesting revelation is that England never committed and never actually had enough military strength on our side of the pond to defeat Gen. Washington’s somewhat ragtag army.

Apparently the King and his ministers

wanted to hang on to the sugar islands

more urgently than they wanted

to keep the 13 colonies in the family.

Indeed, O’Shaughnessy takes pains to outline his argument that “the defense of the islands influenced British military strategy and contributed to the eventual British defeat at Yorktown,” sealing the victory of the rebellious mainland colonies in 1781 (p. xvi). The demands of West Indies plantation owners for protection, and the desire of the British government to secure the vast wealth of the sugar trade, caused naval and army forces to be allocated to the West Indies and thus drawn away from the Revolutionary War theater.

An Empire Divided was an insightful learning experience for me.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

New England Encounters (book review)

…the complex relations between Indians and colonists

click here

Writing Rainbows: Poems for Grown-Ups with 59 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Pin It on Pinterest