This America…by Jill Lepore, book review

This America…by Jill Lepore, book review

“nationalism” is an obstacle

 

 

Book review:

This America: The Case for the Nation

 

by Jill Lepore

New York: Liveright Publishing Corp., 2019

150 pages

 

The United States has been a recognizable entity barely—barely—long enough to be a nation.

Today we barely acknowledge our American Indian heritages, which could be part of our nationhood if we thought about it once or twice.

Jill Lepore offers what she is so good at offering: a sensible and informed discussion of what “nation” means, and why “nationalism” is an obstacle to the good life, and why “liberalism” should be what we like to talk about.

Read This America to get her details. Read it and talk about it.

Of course, her book is a political discourse, but it is not rabidly partisan. It’s something to think about.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2025 All rights reserved.

 

Old Friends (book review)

Tracy Kidder tells truth about old age…

click here

Above all: Poems of dawn and more with 74 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

The Greatest Sentence Ever Written…book review

The Greatest Sentence Ever Written…book review

what does “self-evident” mean?

 

 

Book review:

The Greatest Sentence Ever Written

 

by Walter Isaacson (b1952)

New York: Simon & Schuster, 2025

67 pages

 

First, let’s get this straight: it’s worth your time to read this little book.

Maybe you think you know all you want to know about the Declaration of Independence, but I think you’ll learn at least a couple things of interest as you read The Greatest Sentence Ever Written.

For starters, Thomas Jefferson did not “write” the Declaration. He more or less wrote the first draft, and then his committee—including Benjamin Franklin and John Adams—applied their pens, and then the Continental Congress had its final say.

Isaacson’s “greatest sentence” is the second sentence of the Declaration, beginning “We hold these truths to be self-evident…” The words of the sentence had specific meanings for educated men (no ladies in the Congress) with Enlightenment prejudices in the late 18th century, and the committee and Congress changed a number of the words in Jefferson’s draft. For example, Jefferson originally wrote “We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable…”

Keep these “undeniable” circumstances in mind: in July 1776 no member of the Congress knew how the whole “revolution” thing would turn out, and the Declaration did not start the revolution: the shooting war had started more than a year earlier in Lexington and Concord.

Isaacson is a popular biographer, and this little book is a good example of his writing talents.

For a more in-depth treatment by a noted historian, try reading American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence by Pauline Maier.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2026 All rights reserved.

 

Book review: Grace Notes

Is it prose or poetry?

by Brian Doyle

click here

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Did the British lose, or give up, or what?

Did the British lose, or give up, or what?

Did the British really try to win?

 

I have a lot to learn. With the humility of a student, I ask: how hard did the British try to win the American Revolutionary War?

It’s a research topic that intrigues me. I’m using the question to guide my reading. I’m careful to remind myself, often, that I don’t know the full answer. I think I know enough to believe that the bottom line is: the British wanted to win the war, but they never made the commitment required to do it.

I think I know enough to confirm the validity of the question. Britain had substantial economic engagement with the North American colonies in the latter part of the 18th century. The British West Indies—the Caribbean “sugar islands”—also were an important component of the British Atlantic colonial world. Britain had additional commitments in Florida, as well as military outposts, trading posts and other dependencies in Ireland, the Mediterranean, India, Africa, Central America, the Bahamas, the Bermudas, Nova Scotia, Quebec and Hudson’s Bay. Britain was intensely engaged in diplomacy and threatening entanglements with France, Spain and other European powers. Britain was an economic power, not a military titan.

King George and the British government did not have unlimited military resources. Army and naval forces were allocated to the rebellious American colonies, just as they were to the West Indies and other areas of vital interest. French and Spanish forces continually threatened the British Caribbean islands, an economic bastion of the British monarchy. There were not enough British ships and troops to establish compelling military superiority in every arena of British interest.

Ultimately, British admirals could not prevent a localized French naval superiority in the Chesapeake Bay that forced Cornwallis to surrender his under-sized army to Washington and Rochambeau at Yorktown in October, 1781. The war didn’t end then, but after Yorktown it became manifestly unwinnable for Britain.

Did the British government send enough troops and ships to North America to get the job done when the rebellion broke out? Was winning the war a pre-eminent priority for King George and his ministers? Doubtless the British wanted to win. How hard did they try? Initially they thought the rebellion would wither. Later, I think, they had more important fish to fry.

I’m not looking for a simple answer. I’m interested, first, in understanding the meaningful frames of reference for considering the question.

 

Sources:

Bowler, R. Arthur.  Logistics and the Failure of the British Army in American, 1775-1783. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.

Corwin, Edward S. French Policy and the American Alliance of 1778.1916. Reprint, Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1962.

Duffy, Michael. Soldiers, Sugar and Seapower: The British Expeditions to the West Indies and the War Against Revolutionary France. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

Gipson, Lawrence Henry. The Triumphant Empire: The Empire Beyond the Storm, 1770-1776, vol. 13 of The British Empire Before The American Revolution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1967.

O’Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson. An Empire Divided: The American Revolution and the British Caribbean. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.

Seton-Watson, Robert William. Britain In Europe: 1789-1914, A Survey of Foreign Policy. 1937. Reprint, Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press, 1955.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2025 All rights reserved.

 

Home Team: Poems About Baseball (book review)

Edwin Romond hits another homer…

click here

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

The Things They Carried…book review

The Things They Carried…book review

the far side of yourself…

 

 

Book review:

The Things They Carried

 

by Tim O’Brien (b1946)

New York: Broadway Books, 1990

273 pages

 

Tim O’Brien is a Vietnam war veteran.

If you served in the Vietnam war, you have a perspective for reading The Things They Carried.

If you didn’t go to Vietnam, you have a different perspective.

If you weren’t born until after the war ended, you have a different perspective.

Tim O’Brien speaks to you, read his words any way you want.

All of us are still carrying some of the things we carried in those years.

Can anyone point to feelings that haven’t changed since then?

Whether you’re a veteran or not, O’Brien invites you to get “in touch with the far side of yourself” (p. 123).

The Things They Carried is about burdens and our capacity to accept them.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2025 All rights reserved.

 

Book review: To Serve Them All My Days

by R. F. Delderfield

A beloved teacher,

      you know this story…

click here

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity…book review

Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity…book review

Talk to someone “on the other side”…

 

 

Book review:

Uncivil Agreement:

How Politics Became Our Identity

 

by Lilliana Mason

Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2018

183 pages

 

Mason offers penetrating analysis of the partisanship that is driving America deeper into political chaos. The evidence of her sincere, fact-based examination is that she conspicuously does not offer a “how to fix it” conclusion.

This is academic prose—not easy and not entertaining. It is, rather, abundant data, knowledgeably organized and carefully illuminated. Our national sociopolitical chaos is deeply rooted in human nature and it’s frightening when exposed to conscious consideration.

Uncivil Agreement tells the despairing story: too much of our political wrangling and competition has little if anything to do with “issues” and “policies” and laws.  Too much of our partisan political motivation is essentially human emotions—fear, anger, and antipathy to people who are outside one’s own group. 

National political figures like Trump and Sanders and others are—deliberately or inadvertently—stoking angers and fears instead of inviting citizens to vote responsibly for candidates and policies that will benefit them and also benefit the citizens of our country. Too much explosive partisanship is group-oriented (“my group” vs. “other groups”) and reinforced by social interactions and overlapping group identities that not only exclude but also demonize the “other” groups. It’s not simply racial prejudice, but that’s a big part of it.

Mason provides essential understanding of what’s going on in the fearful tumult of American politics. If you read only the final chapter (“Can We Fix It?”), you will learn much of value.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2025 All rights reserved.

 

Literary Life: A Second Memoir…book review

Larry McMurtry’s love affair with books

click here

Writing Rainbows: Poems for Grown-Ups with 59 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

do we have the stuff for democracy?

do we have the stuff for democracy?

good habits, bad habits…

 

 

Lincoln feared that

“democracy required habits of behavior

that people simply could not sustain.”

 

from:

Our Ancient Faith: Lincoln, Democracy, and the American Experiment

Allen C. Guelzo

New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2024

247 pages

p. 142

 

Right now I’m not aware of a lot of good news.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2025 All rights reserved.

 

Book review: Saint Joan          

by George Bernard Shaw

click here

many waters: more poems with 53 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Pin It on Pinterest