The Urban Crucible, by Gary Nash (book review)

The Urban Crucible, by Gary Nash (book review)

ordinary folks had a lot to do with it…

 

 

Book review:

The Urban Crucible:

Social Change, Political Consciousness,

and the Origins of the American Revolution

 

by Gary B. Nash

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979

 

The Urban Crucible is a densely researched and fully explored comparative history of the economic, social, and political environments in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia during the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Here’s my hint: there was more well-informed “mob” action than you have read about in other histories.

The early colonial experiences in the three principal seaport towns are vividly contrasted and authoritatively explained. Nash candidly digs deep and deeper into a wide range of primary sources. The sins and the heroics of the leadership elite and the “leather apron” artisans and the anonymous working poor are examined in profoundly realistic historical context.

You can’t read The Urban Crucible and not learn a lot.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2022 All rights reserved.

 

Is the public interested in public interest news?

Isn’t news the new stuff you suddenly want to know?

click here

As with another eye: Poems of exactitude with 55 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

The Liberty Bell, a book review

The Liberty Bell, a book review

It’s historical, but it’s not history…

 

 

Book review:

The Liberty Bell

 

by Gary B. Nash

New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010

 

The Liberty Bell is lavishly detailed, and it’s a quick read. Give it a try.

Much of what you “know” about the Liberty Bell isn’t quite right. For starters, the dramatically cracked icon sitting in the Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia isn’t the “real” bell ordered in 1752 by the Pennsylvania Provisional Assembly. The original bell cracked the first time it was rung, and it was melted and recast as the one-ton bell we now think of as “the” Liberty Bell. It was cracked in the middle of the 19th century. It doesn’t ring any more.

It wasn’t called the “Liberty Bell” until about 50 years after the Revolutionary War started, when it was “adopted” as an icon of freedom by anti-slavery advocates.

I remember seeing the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia in the 1950s when I was a child. I think the guards said nobody could touch it, but I think I put my finger on it when they weren’t looking.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2022 All rights reserved.

 

Book review:

Clotel, or The President’s Daughter

by William Brown,

America’s first black novelist

click here

Seeing far: Selected poems with 47 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Common Sense by Thomas Paine (comments)

Common Sense by Thomas Paine (comments)

He didn’t mention the “k” word…

 

 

Book review:

Common Sense

 

by Thomas Paine

Isaac Kramnick, ed., intro.

New York: Penguin Books, 1986

 

When I re-read a classic, I try to prepare myself for a couple “aha!” moments and one or two “uh oh!” moments.

I wasn’t disappointed in reading Common Sense this time.

Paine first published (anonymously) his 47-page “pamphlet” on January 10, 1776, after the shooting at Lexington-Concord and before the Declaration of Independence was approved.

Of course, everyone knows Paine argued for “independance” (his 18th century spelling).

This time around, it’s of interest to me to note that Paine very carefully avoided directly challenging King George III by name or even by spelling out his title—the text is full of “k—” references. Paine fully and explicitly described and condemned the bad things that old George was doing and likely to do.

Also, it’s of interest to me that Paine notably includes in his arguments for “independance” that America’s trade and international commerce would be buttressed by separation of the British colonies from Britain. He freely uses “America” and “Americans” in referring to the colonies and the colonists, although a huge majority of English colonists likely thought of themselves as “British” citizens.

Paine gives ample space to biblical themes.

Common Sense was widely and repeatedly republished in 1776 and thereafter—it was astoundingly popular in America, Britain, and elsewhere. Historians suspect that 75,000-100,000 copies were printed.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2022 All rights reserved.

 

The “dime novels” in the Civil War

Think “blood-and-thunder”…

click here

Above all: Poems of dawn and more with 73 free verse poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”
An Empire on the Edge (book review)

An Empire on the Edge (book review)

Book review:

An Empire on the Edge:

How Britain Came to Fight America

 

by Nick Bunker

 

Here’s the short version of Nick Bunker’s thesis:

King George and his government

     let the North American colonies slip from their grasp.

 

A newcomer to the history of the American Revolution might think that this book is a cockeyed way to learn about the “shot heard ‘round the world” and the consequences of the shooting at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775.

An informed student of the Revolutionary War probably will find much new material in Bunker’s relentlessly detailed An Empire on the Edge: How Britain Came to Fight America.

On our side of the pond, we don’t have much opportunity to consider the war or the revolution from the British point of view.

Bunker offers devastating detail about the ill-informed, patronizing, self-serving, doctrinaire, and sometimes feckless actions of Lord North and the British government in the years that led to the sanguinary clash of British regulars and American farmers-militiamen on the road from Concord, through Lexington, to Boston on “that famous day and year.”

An Empire on the Edge offers extensive documentation confirming that the British leaders were largely ignorant of the scope and depth of colonial antipathy toward the various punitive measures that Britain sought to impose in North America, as early as 1765 (the Stamp Act) and continuing to the final, ill-fated steps to chastise the city of Boston after the notorious Tea Party in late 1773.

Bunker describes the half-cocked military moves by Lord North and his ministers in the years leading up to the disastrous outing to Lexington-Concord. The king and his government were not prepared to wage war successfully in North America, partly because they waited too long to believe that the colonists actually would fight, and partly because they disdained the colonials’ fighting capacity, and partly because they put higher priority on their Caribbean sugar colonies, and partly because they were pre-occupied with the military threat posed by France and various European intrigues.

lexington-180975_640Bunker doesn’t speculate on a question that occurs to me: after that first shot was fired at Lexington, did the British really commit themselves to winning the war?

The king and his government made the commitment to fight. They did not, however, at any time before or during the war, commit all the king’s horses and all the king’s men to the military campaign to regain dominion in North America. As the fighting began, a British victory was not immediately feasible. Perhaps it did not become feasible.

Bunker’s analysis of the planning and wrangling in Lord North’s war room suggests that the British wanted to win, but never pushed the right strategic buttons to bring victory within their grasp.

 

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

———

Book review: An Empire Divided

King George and his ministers

wanted the Caribbean sugar islands

more than they wanted the 13 colonies…

by Andrew Jackson O’Shaughnessy

click here

As with another eye: Poems of exactitude with 55 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

 

 

Follow Rick on Facebook

Thoughtful book reviews by Rick Subber

Nothing Found

Red, White, and Black: The Peoples of Early North America (book review)

Red, White, and Black: The Peoples of Early North America (book review)

…and those hairy, smelly foreigners

 

 

Book review:

Red, White, and Black:

The Peoples of Early North America

 

by Gary B. Nash (b1933)

American historian

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, copyright 1974, 4th ed. 2000

362 pages

 

Red, White, and Black offers many partial answers to the question: in the 16th and 17th centuries, what did the First Americans think about the hairy, smelly people from Europe who invaded their country?

Nash offers a scholarly, fully informed, insightful account of the lifestyles and world views of the estimated 60-70 million indigenous people who had a variety of highly developed civilizations.

Some European promoters and some uninformed explorers and colonists that the “New World” was a “virgin wilderness,” but the first colonists were happy to steal the Native Americans’ food and delighted to be able to use their cultivated lands.

The misnamed Indians valiantly tried to maintain their way of life, but European diseases and European guns and steel tipped the balance for the much outnumbered invaders.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Book review. Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2020 All rights reserved.

Fire in the Lake (book review)

you should have read it in 1972…

by Frances FitzGerald

click here

 

Writing Rainbows: Poems for Grown-Ups with 59 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

William Pitt the Younger, AKA Mr. Grumpy

William Pitt the Younger, AKA Mr. Grumpy

Mr. Grumpy (242 years ago)

 

 

“Most accursed, wicked, barbarous, cruel,

unnatural, unjust and diabolical.”

 

William Pitt the Younger, during Parliamentary debate on Feb. 26, 1781

 

Pitt was talking about the American Revolutionary War. Talk about your basic poor loser…

He served in Parliament during the war, and became Britain’s prime minister in 1783, in time to be his country’s front man during the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars. Neither of these assignments was an easy gig.

Pitt (1759-1806) was well respected during his lifetime, but obviously he never listened to his mother when she got on his case about “If you don’t have anything good to say,…”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2020 All rights reserved.

Saint Joan, by Bernard Shaw…book review

she didn’t understand…

click here

Seeing far: Selected poems with 47 free verse and haiku poems,
and the rest of my poetry books are for sale on Amazon (paperback and Kindle)
and free in Kindle Unlimited, search Amazon for “Richard Carl Subber”

*   *   *   *   *   *

Pin It on Pinterest